Loading

We ran 24 new puzzles custom made for our solvers, during 2018, the highest that we have done so far.

These were set by The Oracle (4), Gussalufz (4), Brainiac (3), Mythical (2), Hypatia (2), Avatar (2) and 1 each from Bud, Pixie Dust, Bud & Mona, PunDits, Samurai Pony, Hasslethymi and Teezer. Thank you setters for some exceptional grids.

The total number of submissions received ranged from 16 for one of our toughest puzzles to 47 for our most recent one. There were nearly 90 different participants across all the puzzles. Over the year, we could witness interest and engagement grow among our solvers.

Familiar names were often seen on the leaderboard and the toppers included Ramki Krishnan (7 times), Kishore Rao (7 times), Viresh Ratnakar (3 times), Venkatraghavan (2), Mona Sogal, Bhalchandra Pasupathy, Anirudh Sahni, P.Venkatesan and Shashwat Sinai Salgaocar

Here’s the Summary of the year’s puzzles.

S.No Date Puzzle HOF Setter Submissions All correct Topper
1 10th Jan A Thought Experiment Results The Oracle 26 11 Ramki Krishnan
2 24th Jan Hidden Figure Results Gussalufz 23 14 Kishore Rao
3 7th Feb Flying Solo Results Mythical 34 24 Kishore Rao
4 21st Feb Starting Off Results Hypatia 35 18 Venkatraghavan S
5 7th Mar What the Dickens Results Pixie Dust 40 20 Kishore Rao
6 21st Mar A Familiar Moving Easter Story Results Bud 16 10 Venkatraghavan S
7 1st Apr Easter Eggs Results The Oracle 30 12 Viresh Ratnakar
8 18th Apr French Toast Results Gussalufz 31 15 Kishore Rao
9 2nd May The Secret of the Naga’s Arm Results Hasslethymi 30 20 Kishore Rao
10 16th May Cracker Results Teezer 31 9 Kishore Rao
11 30th May Manpasand Results Avatar 26 4 Mona Sogal
12 13th Jun Bookworms Results PunDits 25 18 Ramki Krishnan
13 27th Jun Fee Fie Fo Fun Results Mythical 30 13 Kishore Rao
14 15th Jul Have a Ball Results The Oracle 36 20 Ramki Krishnan
15 1st Aug King’s Rule Results Gussalufz 33 13 Ramki Krishnan
16 15th Aug Bogus Poems Results Samurai Pony 33 11 Bhalchandra Pasupathy
17 9th Sep Grids Hex Me and Us Results Brainiac 37 14 Ramki Krishnan
18 23rd Sep 24×25 Results Brainiac 46 23 Anirudh Sahni
19 7th Oct Goa’s Echoes Results The Oracle 39 20 P.Venkatesan
20 21st Oct A Matter of Habit Results Brainiac 31 3 Shashwat Sinai Salgaocar
21 4th Nov Peace Results Mona & Bud 20 11 Viresh Ratnakar
22 18th Nov Missing Instructions Results Gussalufz 25 12 Ramki Krishnan
23 2nd Dec Brain Gym Results Avatar 40 26 Viresh Ratnakar
24 16th Dec 4D Results Hypatia 47 34 Ramki Krishnan

Here’s our final leaderboard for 2018.

Congrats to Viresh who topped the leader board with an impressive 2,292 points gained over 24 contests and Venkat who came a close second. Our champ Ramki loses out narrowly since he missed one puzzle and Kishore’s impressive strike rate of 96% gained over 20 contests makes us wish he had continued playing till the end of the year.

Congrats to our top 20 and wish you all the best for the next season.

Hope you enjoyed all our puzzles. Which one was your favorite? Do you have any compliments / brick bats to share with us? Please do write in.

Edited on 8th Jan. 2019
————————

Acceding to our reader’s request, here’s the rest of the leaderboard

By Sowmya

Sowmya is a Chartered Financial Analyst (CFA) and independent financial consultant based in the Middle East (Bahrain). She is a puzzle editor at Amuselabs. She has set over 1,300 crosswords for various publications including over 1000 mini crosswords, cryptic crosswords (under the pseudonym Hypatia for The Hindu) and themed crosswords for Cat.a.lyst (part of The Hindu Businessline). Sowmya runs the Facebook group 1Across where seasoned cruciverbalists interact while setting and solving clues. She has published three compilations of crosswords viz Cryptic Crossroads Volumes 1, 2 and 3. She Tweets cryptic clues daily @somsram

4 thoughts on “1ACGrids Final Leaderboard – 2018”
  1. These grids were a highlight of the year! 🙂 Thanks Sowmya and all the other setters, and congrats leaders!
    What is “Strike Rate” ?

    1. Thanks Anirudh. Strike rate is an average score derived by dividing the total scored by the number the contests participated. Higher the strike rate, better the performance in each contest. So, it lets you compare the performances of those who did not participate in all the contests.

Leave a Reply