1ACCWC - Results

1ACCWC#541 - OPULENCE

Total Clues: 20 Total Voters: 23

✓ Contest Closed - Final Results

# Name Clue Points Voters Anno Comments
1 Textrous New couple breaking up after losing wife's wealth (8) 36 17 NEWCOUPLE* - W; Def: wealth, Anagrind: breaking up, Deletion indicator: after losing, wife: W ---
2 Sowmya Ramkumar One loveless couple fighting plenty (8) 31 15 Def: plenty, ONE C(-o)UPLE* ---
3 Satyen Nabar Hope uncle leaves husband remarkable wealth (8) 24 13 (HOPE UNCLE - H)*; leaves husband= delete h, remarkable= anag ind, def is wealth - This week''s clear winner for me!
4 Ramki Krishnan Wealth of extravagant couple half gone (8) 17 10 Def = wealth, anagram of (COUPLE + (-go)NE), extravagant is anagram indicator ---
5 Kalyan Bandyopadhyay Wealth of one couple, wasted when love is gone (8) 15 10 Definition: Wealth; (ONE COUPLE – O)* indicated by “wasted”, “when love’s gone” = deletion of O (love = O, gone = removed) ---
6 @LowdownCryptic Luxury jeans, oddly discounted, grabbed by frantic couple (8) 14 8 Def: Luxury; (j)E(a)N(s) with odd letters discounted (ignored) inside COUPLE* ---
7 Polslaw Essential ingredients of Monopoly stimulated Glenn’s access to great wealth (8) 13 9 Central letters yield OP + UL + EN + CE. definition = great wealth - Nice idea, I think with a few tweaks the surface could make more sense and then it would be great
8 Sitter Means to rewrite clue with old pen (8) 11 9 Nounal def (means) + anagram (to rewrite) of CLUE + O(ld) PEN - I really like this idea but opulence is more than just ‘means’
9 Samit Kallianpur Plenty of beef but oddly, corn isn't available (8) 11 7 [Corpulence (but no) c r]. Beef = corpulence (Collins). Oddly corn = c r. Isn't available = deletion ind. Def = Plenty ---
10 Veera Raghavan Couple basically needs enough working capital (8) 10 7 (COUPLE N E)*. Working: anind. Definition: Capital (Collins) ---
11 --- Cryptic clue open for great deal of choice(8) 8 4 Anno: (CLUE+OPEN)*. Anagrind: Cryptic. Definition: Great deal of choice. - This was so nearly an excellent clue but ‘great deal of choice’ does not define ‘opulence’
- The definition seems a bit tenuous
12 --- Wind when leaving home for work? Tons of bread! (8) 7 5 (FLAT>OP)ULENCE - I''m not able to understand what the surface means
13 --- Uprising, the French participated in years ago, for wealth [8] 7 5 Up rising = PU followed by LE (The French) in ONCE (= years ago); O pu le NCE; definition = wealth - What if this were an across clue? Rising would not work then.
14 --- Pounce angrily on extremely louche display of wealth (8) 7 4 Anagram of [POUNCE] (anagrind: "angrily") around (“on”) "extremely LouchE” = OPU[LE]NCE; definition: “display of wealth" - "on" doesn''t seem like a containment indicator
15 --- Illicit lucre prone to lose rights to wealth (8) 5 4 Anagram with deletion; Illicit - anagram indicator; (lucre prone)* anagram fodder; to lose rights - deletion of R's; def - wealth - Surface meaning?
16 --- Lavishness of private university library evidently nonplussed certain educational leaders (8) 5 4 Acrostic (O[f] … E[ducational]), indic. by “leaders”; def. “lavishness” ---
17 --- Disturbed couple finds space for comfort 3 2 Space= en, *couple contains en, finds is container indicator, Definition: comfort - I think opulence is more than just comfort
- "finds" doesn''t seem like a containment indicator
- Finds is not a containment indicator. Has would have worked.
- I like the clue but "comfort" seems too mild a term for "opulence"
18 --- No money to take on university - essentially nobility’s luxury 3 2 Def: Luxury Wordplay:O (zero/no) + PENCE around U + (nobi)L(ity’s) ---
19 --- Plenty of open blunders with clue 2 1 Def = plenty; anag of OPEN + CLUE - Not sure this works to indicate anagramming both words
20 --- Luxury, marked primarily by ostentatious, plush upholstery, looking excessively nouveau-chic entirely (8) 1 1 Acrostic clue. Luxury = Defn; primarily = Acrostic indicator; Fodder = 'ostentatious, plush upholstery, looking excessively nouveau-chic entirely' - nice attempt..but 1st letter of nouveau-chic = n?